data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34527/34527b4f7b15f916fb414cfc29a5edbafa9f6e9f" alt=""
The action was brought by a Monterrey band called ‘Kinky’. In 2004 the band registered the word 'kinky' as a trade mark. Because of this, the band began a legal process at the IMPI against the singer, arguing that the public is confused about their presentations with the shows she appeared with their name. On Monday 14th the IMPI brought a statement in favour of the band, serving her with a fine.
Zabaleta informed that she will not change the title of her show. She strongly defended her right to freedom of expression and also asserted that the use of the word ‘kinky’ in her show is an adjective, used for the title of her work –not a trade mark use or identifying the name of an artist.
Amicable practice
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdec0/cdec0f76e29999e267a7e6a0393fefd386c746e7" alt=""
In IP as well as in any other area of law we can resolve matters in an amicable manner. However, Zabaleta reported that she was made aware of the action when she was sued! She did not understand how she could be sued for a ‘word’. She tried to contact the band to settle this matter but her calls were never answered. She explained that she called her show with a forgotten adjective dating back from the XVIII century: meaning twisted and referring to people who have sex in different ways. She mentioned that she was not even aware that there was a band called kinky.
Making the matter less amicable
It is also mentioned that the band and owners of the trade mark ‘kinky’ are analyzing to fill in a civil action for damages caused by misuse of their name.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cc90/8cc90b7a718c8d9089aa2d23f40fdf77943884b1" alt=""
Any kinky thoughts on this case?
Different newspaper and blogs reported the case: check here, here and here.
0 Response to "Mexico: IP office decided a 'kinky' case"
Post a Comment